We have so many excellent resources come through CSDi that we periodically compile them and share them in an occasional, special newsletter.

Please note: web addresses change frequently – if one doesn’t work simply type the resource title into your browser.

12. SPRING QUARTER   Spring Quarter Final Call: Training programs begin May 6.   Become the Solution. 18 distance training programs starting in the next 2 weeks. Learn more about becoming part of the solution to the challenges faced by nonprofits and NGOs.   Which training track best fits your organization’s current need: 1. New Project. Design a sustainable, impact oriented project from scratch. Read more. 2. Pre-launch.  Fine-tune a project you are about to launch to increase its impact and sustainability. Read more. 3. Projects in process.  Fine-tune a project in process to solve challenges with the project and increase its impact. Read more.   If one of the tracks above fulfills organizational need, then the training and consulting programs offered below are for you. Simply use these programs to further develop and organize your project; work with our expert consultants to perfect it.   “Tim Magee, and his colleagues at CSDi, are to be commended for producing a change in the way development is practiced, and so directly contribute to the improvement of millions of lives around the world.” Howard White Executive Director, 3ie   Distance Programs in English & Español May 6, 2014 Distance Training Begins May 6.  Haga click aquí para Cursos en Español. Are you interested in: Designing and Funding Sustainable International Development Projects Designing and Funding Northern Nonprofit Programs and Projects  Community-Based Adaptation to Climate Change A Diploma in Community Based Adaptation to Climate Change A Diploma in Integrated CBA, DRR, & Rural Development   Specialized Training Fine Tune your Projects with this Powerful array of Specialized Training Programs OL 303. Food Security, Nutrition and Home Gardens OL 332. Water Conservation and Management OL 333. Climate Smart Agriculture OL 343. Community-Based Adaptation to Climate Change 3 OL 344. Community-Based Adaptation to Climate Change 4 OL 345. Community Based DRR   We look forward to working with you in our training programs.   Sincerely,   Tim Magee, Executive Director Center for Sustainable Development   Tim Magee is the author of A Field Guide to Community Based Adaptation published by Routledge, Oxford, England.   Like us: CSDi Facebook. Learn more about design and implementing Community Based Development Projects.   Would you like to subscribe to this newsletter?   If you have a question don’t hesitate to contact us at: Online.Learning@csd-i.org.   The Center for Sustainable Development specializes in providing sound, evidence-based information, tools and training for humanitarian development professionals worldwide. CSDi is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.   Contact Us

Through working with over 500 organizations on field projects we learned that Nonprofit organizations and NGOs worldwide need increased access to:

• cost effective training and consulting in effective project design and management
• new donors and new fundraising opportunities
• how-to information on best practices for programs and projects
• consistent, ongoing technical support during project implementation

How does CSDi engage with its field partners?

Field Partners work with local communities to develop solutions to community challenges with the ongoing support of CSDi’s training, guidance and consultancy. Through our proven training and consulting process, Field Partners develop real projects, in real time that are fundable, sustainable, and impact driven.   CSDi program facilitators, who have gained their development expertise in face-to-face consulting with nonprofits and NGOs in the field, consult with partner staff on their projects, provide technical support, and help them design, launch and manage their projects. Upon completion of project design, Field Partners can utilize CSDi’s donation pages for soliciting credit card donations for project funding.

Family Planning, Population and Reproductive Health in International Development Projects
March 19, 2014

For several years we have been publishing special newsletters on partner projects from the field. Here is an example of a field project newsletter:
http://www.csd-i.org/csdi-blog/2011/12/14/field-projects-special-issue-adaptation-islands-water-forest.html

Course participants develop field projects based upon a community needs assessment. This means that community members voice their perception of their needs—which are then included in the project design.

Why isn’t family planning entering the discussion?
	We’ve worked with staff members from 500 organizations in 149 different countries and yet it is been interesting for us to note that very rarely do we see any mention of overpopulation, family planning, or reproductive health.

Recently, two members of our community wrote and expressed concern about this.
Sue from Guatemala, the founder of the leading family planning organization here in Guatemala had this to say:
“Dear Tim – I am disheartened and appalled that in the list of 25 needs that surfaced in the needs assessments reported below, no one identified family planning access.   No developing country is going to be able to thrive and grow without it.”  Sue

Jane, from Australia added this:
“Remarkable – not one mention of population growth as a cause of water stress, nor any mention of incorporating family planning in any of the projects, despite the unmet desire of a large proportion of women in each of these countries to avoid further pregnancies or to space pregnancies.

Without doing this, you are deluding yourself that these actions can have lasting effect. They will not.
Population growth is reducing African land and water per capita five times faster than climate change.” Jane

We mentioned to Jane that we were also surprised at this and that in 2013 we wrote 10 grant proposals to try and fund the development of a Spanish language family-planning course for Latin America—and didn’t get a single nibble.

Jane replied with:
“Thank you for your response to my note. I am heartened that you would welcome partnering with family planning projects.

These involve “Population Health and Environment” programs (PHE) of integrated development, and reproductive health education for youth.

Rather than, or in addition to, a course on the PHE approach, I would be interested to see how the population perspective could be inserted into existing projects. I noticed in a couple of Participatory Needs Assessment reports that I looked at, that the student-facilitator was separating the issues raised by the community into problems and underlying causes. It would seem relevant to me for such activities to raise the issue of population pressure as an underlying cause.

This doesn’t mean that it needs to be the focus of interventions, but becomes part of the awareness and discourse around problem solving. Interventions for water and food security, educational infrastructure and even employment could rightly be seen as mitigating population pressure. It then becomes obvious that, while the current pressure may be mitigated by the planned actions, future increased pressure may not. People understand this – often they only need someone to open the conversation. If the community participants are not receptive to this perspective, it doesn’t have to be pursued at that time. They can take the process in the direction they choose. But at least an opportunity has been given.

My own background is in agricultural development, and I’ve been involved in community participatory projects and farmer field schools in a number of countries. However, now my research is looking at the impacts of population dynamics and of family planning programs, as I see stabilising population as a prerequisite for development, not an afterthought. It seems to me that the best kept secret in the world is that all the family planning nations have romped ahead in economic development, while those who have insisted on development first have stagnated or even destabilised. I looked at the claim that development leads to people choosing smaller families, and haven’t seen any evidence that this contributed to the different paths of different countries. Invariably the family planning programs and the fertility decline came first. In its absence, even the recipients of the highest levels of international aid have struggled to develop in terms of GDP per capita, and have gone backwards in terms of absolute numbers of people in extreme poverty. It is inconscionable that the development industry should continue to turn its back on these facts.”

Jane

What are your thoughts on this?

Why do you feel that family-planning isn’t entering into community-based participatory needs assessments? In other words, why aren’t community members mentioning population and/or a lack of family planning as part of the challenges which they face in their lives?

I look forward to hearing from you,

Tim Magee